Re: Heating/insulation/etc (FWD) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 94 08:19 CST |
DIGGLE [at] MACLINE.COM Roger Diggle is the author of this message but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On 10/28/94 Ray Gasser Maplewood, NJ, EcoVillage at Ithaca wrote: > We have to give up Gas cooking in the houses because > super-insulation and combustion by-products do not get along well together. Something smells fishy about this... Super insulation should not preclude gas cooking. If you aren't getting enough air changes to get rid of gas cooking cobustion fumes, you are also not getting enough air changes to get rid of moisture from cooking, showers, exhaling, what have you, as well as any other contaminants of your indoor air, such as radon. As a matter of fact, If you cook fish, with or without gas, and you have poor ventilation, it will smell fishy for a week. Tight houses are good because they let you control air changes, but you still have to have air changes, or you invite many problems. Air-to-air heat exchangers, also known as heat recovery ventilators, should be a standard item in any tight building, in my opinion. The warm stale air from the house is blown through a heat exchanger and to the outside. Fresh cold air from outside is blown through the other side of the heat exchanger and brought into the house. Much of the heat that you paid to install in the stale air is transferred to the incoming fresh air, so it's more energy efficient than opening windows. My pesonal favorite design for these ventilators uses a moisture permeable paper heat exchanger. This may seem counterproductive, since the main thing you're trying to do is get rid of moisture. However, only a portion of the moisture passes through the paper between airstreams, so much of the moisture is still removed. Moreover, this style of heat exchanger almost never frosts up, so the units are simpler. They don't need defrost controls, and don't run a defrost cycle, so they are less expensive and more reliable. The extra run-time required to get rid of the recirculated moisture is still about as efficient as impermeable units which run defrost cycles. Altech Industries and Research Products make such equipment. I can furnish further information if there is interest. Roger Diggle, Porch Light CoHousing, Madison, WI - via BulkRate 2.0 *********************************************************************** Mac Line BBS: (608) 233-9487 - A FirstClass System in Madison, WI USA **********************************************************************
-
Re: Heating/insulation/etc (FWD) Fred H Olson WB0YQM, November 1 1994
- Re: Heating/insulation/etc (FWD) Stephen Hawthorne, November 2 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.