Re: Zoning & SLUD's - Call for experiences | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Snyder-Grant (Jim_Snyder-Grant.LOTUS![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 94 15:06 CST |
For New View, we used the "Planned Conservation Residential Community" (PCRC) bylaw of Acton Mass. We required no significant variances to get our site plan approved. I think that variants of this sort of zoning law are called "clustered housing statutes". The intent of this statute is to preserve open space while allowing clustered housing, by requiring the same overall maximum density as is standard in Acton zoning (1 house/acre) while requiring that a certain percentage of the land is left undeveloped. (We got a bit more density into our site plan by using the town affordable housing statutes). We left both an inner & outer area as our undeveloped area. The statute apparently allows a variety of ownership structures to enforce the non-development of the land, but so far in Acton, all the PCRCs have been done as condomiums, so owners have a narrow exclusive use zone around their houses, and the commonly held land includes the common house, the roads, and all the PCRC undeveloped land. Our condo docs outlinewhat we can & can't do to the common land, and explicitly reference the PCRC regulations. During the time we were developing our land, the town meeting passed a resolution proposed by the planning board that PCRC approvals no longer require town meeting approval, but instead are handled by the planning board. This change, unrelated to our looking to develop land in Acton, helped our timeline a lot. Because, in the middle stages of our permitting, we had some neighborhood opposition, we were very careful to not have the planning board take any irregular shortcuts that could be used as the basis of a lawsuit later. So, while the board was certainly friendly, and gave us advice, and did things in a timely manner, they didn't do anything extraordinary for us in the permitting process. The lack of a clustered housing bylaw eliminated some towns from our consideration, when we were narrowing our list of towns. Our professionals thought that getting waivers & exemptions & special permits would be too hard & too expensive & too time-consuming & too risky. -Jim Snyder-Grant Jim_Snyder-Grant [at] lotus.crd.com
-
Re: Zoning & SLUD's - Call for experiences Jim Snyder-Grant, November 28 1994
- Re: Zoning & SLUD's - Call for experiences Rob Sandelin, November 29 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.