Re: housing enmasse | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kevin Wolf (kjwolf![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 13:41 CST |
Why can't the community be 6-8 co-housing communities all linked in some manner. Each co-housing group could have its own common house etc, but the community overall might have a office building, childcare facility, food buying club office etc. Think of co-housing as building blocks and basic units of a community. Kevin Wolf N Street Co-housing On Thu, 2 Feb 1995 areinert [at] linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us wrote: > > > On W d, 1 Feb 1995, Blake F. Cullimore wrote: > > > > I am a College student that has been studying the concepts that cohousing > > is based on and have seen two groups in action. One that is looking for > > a location and one that moved in a year ago. In our design class we have > > focused on the values that make this system work and how it relates to > > the design of the community. In the last week we have decided on a site > > and have been given the requirements of developing a community that is a > > 170 units on a 25 acres. The site is a dune scrub community within a > > small town with single family homes around the site. The site also has a > > major runoff system and perrenial flood zone running through it. I am of > > the opinion that the design of such a community would do injustice to the > > values that create a well founded and functioning community. > > > > Can a housing development have 170 units even if clustered? Is this a > > mass subdivision in a politically correct disguise? Can a sense of > > community be developed in such circumstances? > > > > blake cullimore > > > Hmm. I don't think that something that large could be "cohousing" > community in the sense of a small group of households defining and > operating it cooperatively. It could be a real nice small town to live > in though, the sort of natural neighborly small town (bigger than a > village) that we hope cohousing is a deliberate recreation of. But it > couldn't be cohousing in the details of, oh, 100's to dinner and forums > and meetings. And the grounds meeting over trying deal with and > ameliorate the terrible site would probably tear it up anyway. > > Gee. I guess that means No. > > --- Kevin Wolf 724 N St Davis, CA 95616 phone and fax: 916-758-4211
-
housing enmasse Blake F. Cullimore, February 1 1995
- Re: housing enmasse areinert, February 1 1995
- Re: housing enmasse Kevin Wolf, February 2 1995
- Re: housing enmasse areinert, February 2 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.