Re: Housing enmasse/kibbutz/hello from Riverdale | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Hune Margulies (hm64![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 07:08 CST |
I know the Kibbutz quite well. In particular I'm conversant with the theoretical literature and history of its development. I think it's OK to place the kibbutz and US style cohousing in a common historical tread, that is, the attempt to develop communal styles of life. What I would caution, is not to attempt to compare or place too strong an affinity between these two housing institutions. The Kibbutz evolved out of a national and social historical circumstance the like of which cannot be replicated elsewhere, not even in Israel itself, accounting partially for the changes in the Kibbutz's inner structure away from "communism" and more into "communitarianism". The original ideas of the Kibbutz, those found in Buber, A.D. Gordon and other were strongly influenced by european left-pacifist-anarchism (especially by Landauer). They were also committed zionists struggling to build a new nation with scarse financial and natural resources. common ownership of land and the means of production was only natural considering the lack of a capitalistic class of entrepreneurs. American intellectual tradition never included within its mainstream any of the anarchist type philosophies, (again, within its mainstream intellectual baggage) nor it had to undergo the same national liberation experience. American economic development was quite different from that experienced by early Israel. It seems to me that perhaps, and this is only an early historical observation, while many cohousers see the kibbutz as a sort of "elder brother", justifiably so, many present day Kibbutz leaders might actually want to seriously look at the American-cohousing experience, considering that economic and social conditions of nowadays Israel resemble more those of America than earlier Israel did. Hune
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.