Re: co-housing and real-estate investments | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Snyder-Grant (Jim_Snyder-Grant.LOTUS![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 15:47 CST |
Bill asked about how different cohousers have approached the value of preserving resale value for the house. Although New View did not explicitly have this as a goal, we quickly backed into it by the following route: 1) 'Affordability' was a primary goal (i.e., that the members could afford to buy their houses, not that we expected to meet any formal affordable housing guidelines) 2) An important part of affordability was how much money people had to put down. 3) If we designed houses that cost more than they appraised for, banks would require that we put down the difference in addition to whatever the normal loan terms were. 4) A bank appraisal is specifically designed to make an educated and conservative guess at market value. So, our planning proces had to make sure that we kept the total construction cost at or near the total of each house's appraised value. After we got our first preliminary & rough construction budget & appraisal, we agreed on a target of a maximum of 5% overage. So, assuming we hit that target (or better: there is still hope), and assuming the bank's appraisals do predict the market, people who buy & then have to sell soon are facing a rough maximum of a 5% exposure, plus dual closing costs. As far as I know, we are all planning to stay here much longer then that of course, but it's good to have a sense of the possible downside. Some of us have the optimistic sense that since the bank has no way to know yet the market value of cohousing in our area, that the actual short-term downside risk is less - a suggestion of an existence proof is that there are all these buyers (and a waiting list) apparently ready to pay a premium beyond appraisal to live in cohousing. You also asked about resale restrictions. I can't say as much about that. We are organized as a condo so we can't have many restrictions of that type. You also talked about your house as a major piece of your assets. This is a concern for me, as well, because unlike owning a conventional single-family house, I REALLY don't want want to plan on selling this house & moving somewhere cheaper in order to retire. I want to retire right here. My wife and I are already planning to live in the smallest type of unit on the site. So my financial plan has to find a way to cover not using my house to support my retirement, except as a place to live in. On the one hand, that helps relieve some of my anxiety about resale. On the other hand, it puts more pressure on my other investments & sources of income. One part of my plan is to hope that cohousing becomes a good place to learn & practice living on less and enjoying it more. You also noted that this was not just buying a house in a friendly community: you are also becoming a joint developer of that community, which has its own risks independent of buying a home there. For that, I think there is no substitute for trust-building conversations with the other members of the group, and then a legally-reviewed written agreement covering contingencies. Good luck. As far as I can tell, you are thinking through the same issues that many of us had to think through about financial planning & cohousing. -Jim-Snyder-Grant [at] lotus.crd.com
-
co-housing and real-estate investments BILL ZAHAVI, PERF. EXPERTISE CENTER (DTN: 227-3182), February 10 1995
- Re: co-housing and real-estate investments Jim Snyder-Grant, February 10 1995
- RE: co-housing and real-estate investments Rob Sandelin, February 13 1995
- RE: co-housing and real-estate investments Dan Everett, February 13 1995
- RE: co-housing and real-estate investments John Eaton, February 13 1995
- RE: co-housing and real-estate investments Loren Davidson, February 13 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.