Re: Cohousing & traditional neighborhood movements. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jeffrey O. Hobson (johobson![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 10:04 CST |
Mike Mariner wrote: >Why can't we renovate existing neighborhoods? I know, I know -- >obviously it's a long struggle to get enough people in a single city block to >want community enough to turn it into anything resembling cohousing. Zoning >laws and lots of other institutions resist it. N Street has not had any problems with zoning laws or with city planning staff. Everything we've done has been transparent to them. The one interaction we've had was when one person turned a garage into a two-story granny-flat. They ok-ed it when the five (at that time) adjacent landowners signed a mutual access agreement. I think anyone who visited would say that N Street very closely resembles cohousing ;-) Tear down those fences! Jeffrey Hobson johobson [at] wheel.ucdavis.edu N Street Cohousing, Davis Energy Group
-
Re: Cohousing & traditional neighborhood movements. Ryan O'Dowd, February 13 1995
- Re: Cohousing & traditional neighborhood movements. Tom Ponessa, February 13 1995
- Re: Cohousing & traditional neighborhood movements. Jeffrey O. Hobson, February 13 1995
- RE: Cohousing & traditional neighborhood movements. Rob Sandelin, February 13 1995
- Re: Cohousing & traditional neighborhood movements. Rob Sandelin, February 13 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.