Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rebecca Dawn Kaplan (rebecca![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 95 10:03 CST |
Arne feels that those who are offended by government-sanctioned celebration of Christmas need to "lighten up". This sounds like a convenient call for the perpetuation of the status quo, so that the "oppressed" majority won't have to be bothered to think about anyone else. The example of the schools which do not allow the "c-word" is not quite true. It is not that people are not allowed to *say* the word Christmas, it is that they are not allowed to refer to winter break as "christmas holidays". Actually, I agree with Arne, they should call the break Christmas, because it *is*, and that is my whole point. Public schools, and almost all employers, give people Christmas off. NOT hanukah, NOT kawanza, NOT ramadan, NOT yom kippur, but Christmas is the holiday for which everyone is given a vacation. The fact that the school might hold an in-school menhorah or kawanza-log lighting doesn't even come close to equalling the systematic preference given to christia students in the form of having their holiday off from school. (Though i would be perfectly willlijng to agree that a public school shouldn't be celebrating other holidays either, and besides, they are probably doing it wrong. How would one hold a yom kippur service in schoo anyway?) The reason schools don't refer to the break as "christmas" does not help students of minority religions, it only allows christians to avoid the guilt over having their holiday officially sanctioned. I suspect that the schools think that by demanding that people refer to it as Winter Break, then no one will notice that it mysteriously always happens to coincide with christmas. Arne feels that he shouldn't have to give up the celebrations of "his culture" so that others won't feel bad, especially since celebrations of minority cultures are being encuraged. Thanks for saying this. This sounds like an acknowledgment that Christmas is a cleebration from *your* culture, not some universal celebration. After all, if it were merely a culturally-neutral homage to capitalism, then whywould anyone here want so badly to celebrate it publicly i n their cohousing group? I think a lot of this comes down to a question of how decisions should be made in cohousing with regard to minority interests. Do we simply use majority-rule? Do we say that every groups traditions are equally wqelcome? What if i want to celebrate a wiccan tradition that involves a nude physical ritual of saturnalia? Would this be welcome in the common house? This question of cultural dominance is not merely theoretical. I and many others have ancestors who were beaten or killed for refusing to celebrate christmas. Ignoring power differentials, and asserting that Christianity is being suppressed, while it still retains so much social support, is dishonest and will not help create more genuinely multiculturally-supportive communities. I am willing to defend the right of anyone, christians included, to celebrate their traditions. It is easier to do so when the people demanding their rights are willing to acknowlegde that it *is* their traditions that they are trying to defend. If christmas were a culturally-neutral universal, we would not even be having this discussion, because theyre would be no one around to disagree. -rebecca
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing, (continued)
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing Judy, February 13 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing areinert, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing areinert, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing fmancino, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing Rebecca Dawn Kaplan, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing Barbara Saunders, February 14 1995
- RE: Xmas trees in Cohousing Jean Pfleiderer, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing areinert, February 14 1995
- RE: Xmas trees in Cohousing Rebecca Dawn Kaplan, February 14 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.