RE: Xmas trees in Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rebecca Dawn Kaplan (rebecca![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 95 17:16 CST |
OK, I want to acknowledge Jean's point that the tone i used was unnecessarily antagonistic. However, in the factual responses to my post, it seems you didn't read Arne's originial post which I was taking to task. Jean says that "no one here" said that xmas was a universal holiday, and no one here was trying to celebrate xmas in the common space of cohousing. (in fact, i think you also implied that anyone who thought christmas was universal would have to be an uneducated fool). However, the first post that instigated all of this was *precisely* that argument. Someone posted that they felt uncomfortable with the xmas tree being placed *in the common space*. And Arne replied that we shouldn't complain about xmas being celebrated in the common space because it is not a christian religious ritual, but rather, a culturally neutral celebration. That assumption of universality was what I was responding to. Jean also asks, where is it that i disagree with Arne about the public schools not being allowed to write xmas? After all, I agreed with him that they should be allowed to. My point was that Arne brought up this "ban" as an example of anti-chsirtian bias. What i was trying to point out, using the hypoerbole of the guilt-freeing conspiracy, was that even though the word xmas is not used, christians still get their holiday off. Do you think this is a coincidence? Of course, it would be silly to make a school in a majority-christian area be open on xmas. And, many of these things on which we each have strong theoretical opinions would be much more easily resolved within a community in which we all knew each other, and were mutually trying to reach amutually-agreeable solution. However, communities are generally not forced to do so when it comes to the main christian holiday. Schools, offices, etc are closed on Dec 25th whether the local people want them to be or not. Christians never have to ask for the day off, never have to approach teachers and ask for a makeup exam, etc. That is why I think it is unreasonable to argue thaT christians are oppressed by current multicultural efforts, though I grant that it is possible for a formerly oppressed group to gain power & oppress others. I agree that everyone's culture & traditionsshould be valued. All that I was asking, at the beginning of this discussion, is that those who are asking to celebrate xmas *not* pretend that they are not talking about their specific cultural tradition. Doing so puts christians in the position of being able to just do their thing, while everyone else is made to feel like they are asking special favors. Obviously, not all cohousing groups work this way, and many people are deeply sensitive to each other, and I know I don't argue this strongly in person, and I am sure many cohousing communities can deal with these issues perfeclty well. However, the double standard is in the official laws of these United States, and for those of us who grew up with that double-standard, I bet it has enduring affects. In Massachussetts, christians are legally guaranteed the right to hav xmas off,no matter what. (with very rare exceptions). Everyone else has the right to ask for their holidays off, and the employer is obligated to *try* to be accomodating, only to the extent that it does not threaten the finacnces or other well-being of the company. -rebecca
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing, (continued)
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing Rebecca Dawn Kaplan, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing Barbara Saunders, February 14 1995
- RE: Xmas trees in Cohousing Jean Pfleiderer, February 14 1995
- Re: Xmas trees in Cohousing areinert, February 14 1995
- RE: Xmas trees in Cohousing Rebecca Dawn Kaplan, February 14 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.