Re: CoHo and Renting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joaniblank (Joaniblank![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 05:18 CST |
Glad to see this discussion of renting. I also have a unit to share at Doyle Street. I've had only one nibble though you'd think I'd be swamped, Emeryville being 15 minutes from downtown San Francisco and 5 minutes from downtown Berkeley. But the general issue of mixed owned and rented units within a project is worthy of exploration. I can get my brain around roommates/housemates more easily than I can around homes potentially being owned by someone who is not *into* CoHousing, and is purchasing the home, say as an investment. How would such a person be involved in the planning process if the project was not yet completed--or not even started? How could the group put pressure on such a "landlord" not to sell his or her house to someone who was not interested in participating in the community. When I joined the Doyle St. group I was required to sign a participation agreement. Among other things, I agreed not to rent or sell my home to anyone who was not also willing to sign a similar agreement. Although we no longer require people to sign particpation agreements--we had to take such a requirement out of our condo association bylaws in order to get our individual mortgages--we strongly encourage them to do so. Joani Blank
-
Re: CoHo and Renting Joaniblank, March 8 1995
- Re: CoHo and Renting Rob Sandelin, March 9 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.