RE: Projected Costs vs Real Costs | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mark Ontkush (ontkush![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 14:00 CST |
Sweat equity for intentional community and cohousing sweat equity is much more feasible than it seems to appear to many of the posters on this list. My experience with building for community comes from 7 years being involoved in all different phases of actual construction and also a 15 month stay at the Findhorn Community in Scotland, where they are attempting to build an ecovillage. Here are my points : (1) It is not necessary to have experience in construction, but if this is the case, allow for more time to construct. Some of houses built at Findhorn were done with 90% unskilled workforce, and the final product is of far higher quality than market contractors. A ggod medium is a 1 to 1 ratio of skilled/unskilled. I think that cohousers should attempt to demystify the skills involved in construction - in all honesty, it is not that difficult. (2) Savings in sweat equity can be used to buy quality materials. Average labor costs of projects is around 50% or so, but Findhorn's average has about 22%. This means that 30% of the entire funds could be poured into quality materials. For example, we would use instrument quality timber for making such mundane things as windowsills, or use this saved money to install stained glass windows. The overall effect is astonishing, for it appears as if the value of the housing is 3 - 4 times as great as actual construction costs. (3) My personal opinion is hiring a contractor for a cohousing project is an expensive proposition. In my experience, most market construction is done by an highly unskilled, exploited workforce that has no sense of quality. Without getting into the dynamics of the industry and the labor force, it suffices to say that most materials have been standardized to be thrown up quickly. Some examples are plywood sheets, vinyl siding, and drywall. I cannot emphasize enough that an outside contractor has no interest in the project after the completion date, and is out for profit alone. This WILL result in poor construction and severe corner-cutting. I'm sorry if this seems harsh, but I've seen enough roofs made out of 2x4's and houses build 4 inches out of square (adjusted with a chain saw) to make be a believer. Do as much as possible yourself. mark
-
RE: Projected Costs vs Real Costs BPaiss, March 30 1995
- RE: Projected Costs vs Real Costs Pablo Halpern, March 31 1995
- RE: Projected Costs vs Real Costs Rob Sandelin, March 31 1995
- RE: Projected Costs vs Real Costs Mark Ontkush, March 31 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.