Re: architecture | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 5 May 95 11:52 CDT |
Peter Starr, Marsh Commons STARTRAK [at] REDWOOD.NORTHCOAST.COM is the author of the message below but due to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop (Fred). **************** FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS ********************* Response to Joyce Plath >I don't think the critical issue is formal architectural training but >experience at design and site planning surely must not be dismissed so >easily. To do it well person or group needs more than a set of guidelines >or principles. >work done by architects is terrific but I must say that most houses I see >designed by owners or contractors lack good traffic patterns, solar >orientation, creative solutions to lighting problems, appropriate site >planning and much more. I think that the key here is "design professionals". It takes a lot of experience to utilize small parcels of land, to deal with a limited solar orientation in creative ways, and most especially, use design elements, such as paths, flows, gateways, and private, common, and public space to help in the creation of community. Most conventional building design seems to be either motivated by the needs of the developer; to get the buildings okayed fast, built quickly, and sited for perusal from the passing automobile; or the need of the architect and the owner to "express" themselves; or of the owner to live out some rural-urban fantasy mix. Rarely, if ever, is community and the incredibly complicated issues of "urban" (and by that I mean public) design even considered beyond the demands of local civic code -- which cares more about fire-truck access, and believe-it-or-not, potential nuclear war, then children's play areas, the commons, the green, public discourse, shared ownership and responsibility and community. No wonder people feel alienated, angry and driven to consume. These issues are probably not addressed much in conventional architecture courses. I wouldn't be surprised if the architecture establishment (here's to a great 60's expression) spent one half of one semester dealing with it, just about the same amount of time that modern doctors spend on nutrition and exercise in med school. In another words, in a linear educational system, it would be difficult to see the shrubs for the paths, if you're being trained to be the next corbusier. There are probably some landscape designers, working with a good contractor, who would be be better suited to create a successful cohousing community than a lot of classically trained architects. Or go to your neighborhood permaculturist! >In fact without >my imput as a designer the site would never have been purchased because it >took a practiced vision to see its transformation from a run down truck shop >with a large gravel parking lot into a special place to live. Kudos to Joyce! Peter Starr, Marsh Commons Starr Track We Track the Natural Products industry Peter Starr___________Sara Starr
-
Re: architecture JoycePlath, May 3 1995
- Re: architecture Fred H Olson WB0YQM, May 5 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.