| Re: architecture | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Fred H Olson WB0YQM (fholson |
|
| Date: Fri, 5 May 95 11:52 CDT | |
Peter Starr, Marsh Commons STARTRAK [at] REDWOOD.NORTHCOAST.COM
is the author of the message below but due
to a listserv problem it was posted by the COHOUSING-L sysop (Fred).
**************** FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS *********************
Response to Joyce Plath
>I don't think the critical issue is formal architectural training but
>experience at design and site planning surely must not be dismissed so
>easily. To do it well person or group needs more than a set of guidelines
>or principles.
>work done by architects is terrific but I must say that most houses I see
>designed by owners or contractors lack good traffic patterns, solar
>orientation, creative solutions to lighting problems, appropriate site
>planning and much more.
I think that the key here is "design professionals". It takes a lot of
experience to utilize small parcels of land, to deal with a limited solar
orientation in creative ways, and most especially, use design elements, such
as paths, flows, gateways, and private, common, and public space to help in
the creation of community.
Most conventional building design seems to be either motivated by the needs
of the developer; to get the buildings okayed fast, built quickly, and sited
for perusal from the passing automobile; or the need of the architect and
the owner to "express" themselves; or of the owner to live out some
rural-urban fantasy mix. Rarely, if ever, is community and the incredibly
complicated issues of "urban" (and by that I mean public) design even
considered beyond the demands of local civic code -- which cares more about
fire-truck access, and believe-it-or-not, potential nuclear war, then
children's play areas, the commons, the green, public discourse, shared
ownership and responsibility and community. No wonder people feel
alienated, angry and driven to consume.
These issues are probably not addressed much in conventional architecture
courses. I wouldn't be surprised if the architecture establishment (here's
to a great 60's expression) spent one half of one semester dealing with it,
just about the same amount of time that modern doctors spend on nutrition
and exercise in med school. In another words, in a linear educational
system, it would be difficult to see the shrubs for the paths, if you're
being trained to be the next corbusier.
There are probably some landscape designers, working with a good contractor,
who would be be better suited to create a successful cohousing community
than a lot of classically trained architects. Or go to your neighborhood
permaculturist!
>In fact without
>my imput as a designer the site would never have been purchased because it
>took a practiced vision to see its transformation from a run down truck shop
>with a large gravel parking lot into a special place to live.
Kudos to Joyce!
Peter Starr, Marsh Commons
Starr Track
We Track the Natural Products industry
Peter Starr___________Sara Starr
-
Re: architecture JoycePlath, May 3 1995
- Re: architecture Fred H Olson WB0YQM, May 5 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.