Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: CSpirito (CSpirito![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 09:07:36 -0500 |
I think the name/image problem has to do with the need for an _INTENTIONAL- grouping of people. This implies to me that people/families are SELECTED by some admissions group. This is already distasteful to me... "I wouldn't want to be a member of any group that would have me as a member" - to quote/ paraphrase Woody Allen, I think. Someone recently listed the common traits of "community" as Communication, Cooperation and Caring... If you REALLY care, then one of your goals should be Inclusiveness, so that anyone can belong who shares the other common values. Without that, you have only a very exclusive social club or, worse, a sort of live-in country club for the affluent and well-connected. This is not my idea of "community" from a reformed lurker... Carl Spirito, in southern Maine (cspirito [at] mailbox.une.edu) mid-fifties, married 31 years, 3 grown kids University Professor - Physiology hobbiest sculptor and scale model builder (trains, etc.) Not in any "coho" situation, but trying to build true community in my town of 15K people.
-
Re: Cohousing Alternative Douglas Simons, August 3 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply CSpirito, August 4 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply 'Judith Wisdom, August 4 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply William Dean, August 7 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply JoycePlath, August 7 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply Pablo Halpern, August 8 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.