Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Pablo Halpern (phalpern![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 09:30:03 +0100 |
Stephan Farley wrote: >I know that the term "cohousing" is by now well-entrenched as the main >descriptor of the movement, it being the title of the main book, the main >journal, and the main mailing list, but I want to risk heresy by suggesting >that the term may be hurting us and preventing us from sharing cohousing >with a larger, more mainstream audience. Any time you adopt a term for a movement or concept, you separate that concept from the rest of the world. Although this has undesirable consequences, it is absolutely essential for any movement to succeed. Giving a name to something is one of the most powerful (in a positive sense) actions one can take to in working with that thing. I don't think we could have a powerful movement or internet mailing list without some term to describe what we are doing. OK, so did we pick the wrong term? I don't think so. Any term we choose is likely to produce an automatic negative reaction from at least some segement of the population. Call it "neo-traditional neighborhoods" and you will turn off the liberals. Call it "communitarian housing" and you will turn off the conservatives. The truth is that you cannot describe cohousing in two or three words, so any attempt to do so will cause misunderstanding. Harry's suggestion of "Socially Sustainable Neighborhoods" suffers from this problem. If we were not already discussing cohousing, I might take his term to mean government social engineering or something. Also, the word "sustainable" is a mega-buzzword these days, which would have turned me off. The nice thing about the term "cohousing" is that it is short and does not attempt to be excessively descriptive. "Cohousing" is not a buzzword except in the cohousing movement. Sure, some people who are not given a clear explanation might conjure up their own meaning for it, but other people are more likely to ask "cohousing, what's that?" than to assume they have the term figured out for themselves. In summary, I'd say the term Cohousing is helping more than it is hurting. - Pablo Pablo Halpern phalpern [at] truffle.ultranet.com (508) 435-5274 New View Cohousing, Acton, MA
- Is the term Cohousing hurting us?, (continued)
- Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Stephen Farley, August 3 1995
- Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Eddie Matejowsky, August 3 1995
- Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Harry Pasternak, August 3 1995
- Re: Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Harry Pasternak, August 3 1995
- Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Pablo Halpern, August 4 1995
- Is the term cohousing hurting us? Susan Johnston, August 4 1995
- RE: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Rob Sandelin, August 4 1995
- Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Fred H Olson WB0YQM, August 4 1995
- Re: Is the term Cohousing hurting us? Fred H Olson WB0YQM, August 22 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.