Re: Sustainable building practices | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Peter Starr (startrak![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 16:04:45 -0600 |
There has been an ongoing theme underlying the discussions about foam core, strawbale, and other building systems that assumes that good old-fashioned wood is not sustainable. Given the poor state of our nations' forests and the criminally-lax environmental law enforcement in them, I would have to agree that current timbering and lumber practices are incredibly destructive. We are wiping out whole populations of salmon, seabirds, owls, and dozens of less-imposing but equally significant plant and animals species, that might not return ever because of soil erosion. We are also destroying communities, and local and national economies in the name of short-term profit. Here in the Pacific Northwest, I see on a daily basis the result of leveraged buyouts by Wall Street Wizards and Junk Bond Kings. We are giving away our children's natural assets right now, to Europeans, Japanese, and certain very rich American suburban yuppies who build trophy homes and then go down the Colorado river to find themselves. There is a solution to this. If any of you understand the principles of organic agriculture, you should be glad to know that a similar environmental movement is afoot in the timber industy. Check out the Institute for Sustainable Forestry, PO Box 1580, Redway CA, 95560. They will send you the "Good Wood" guide to purchasing ecological forest products. It lists suppliers and other organizations. There is one large timber firm, Collins Pine Company, 1618 S.W. First Avenue, Suite 300, Portland, Oregon 97201 that claims to has been harvesting wood for 50 years on a 90,000 acre piece of land. They say that have never clearcut and they have never had the need to replant. That means no chemicals, no fertilizers. It indicates good forestry practices. The sustainable timber industry is where organic agriculture was 10 years ago. Organic is now a $2.5 billion dollar a year industry and growing at 20% a year. People are now making very big money in it, even though the mainstream still tends to think of it as fringy. The sustainable forest products industry is just now creating cerification standards and groups that can go into the woods and say with assurance that this timber plan, and those practices are for the long-term good of the community. There is no reason why lovely homes could not be built from local lumber anywhere in this country or at least from forests that aren't devastated in the process. It might cost a little more, as organic did and an increasingly doesn't, but then here's a opportunity to put our money where our mouths are. Hey, how about good, old-fashion stone. Shakespeare's home outside of London is over 400 years old -- warm in the winter, cool in the summer -- great R value. It's made from timbers and stone. The solution is APPROPRIATE technology. Not technology that is exciting because it is new. Peter Starr
-
Re: Sustainable building practices Peter Starr, November 28 1995
- Re: Sustainable building practices Eddie Matejowsky, November 28 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.