RE: communal housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (Exchange) (Robsan![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 14:34:20 -0600 |
Barbara wrote IMO, "communal living" offers the potential for "community," not *just because of the living together, but also because of the potential for saving money and working less in the corporate jobs people usually work to make enough money to buy houses in middle-class neighborhoods. The potential for a life that revolves around community rather than work. There seems to be a growing number of communally owned homes happening, at least in the Seattle area. I have gotten a number of calls from folks, after an article I ran in Community Resources, about folks who either are, or want to share home ownership. There are simple partnership arrangements which can set up for sharing ownership and there seems to be significant benefits. The disadvantage of course is how to settle out peoples shares when they leave, although this can set up so the person who is leaving is responsible for selling of their share. Another question of course is compatability which can be tested for by leasing first. It is unfortunate that it is currently illegal for unrelated adults to live in the same house under some of the local zoning codes. Although this is seldom ever enforced, it can still be a deterant to co-ownership, although a simple corporate stucture can outmanuever these dumb laws. At Sharingwood we have a group house for sale that would work really well for co-ownership within the communty. Rob Sandelin Northwest Intentional Communities Association
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.