reply to Rob | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Scott Cowley (SCOWLEY![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:04:15 -0600 |
Rob writes: >Why is this a crucial issue for you? And what aspects of it are crucial? >I'm having a hard time understanding your point so I have several >questions. Is it your belief that cohousing is supposed to solve the housing >problems of America, or the rest of the world? And if you beleive that, >why? Are you a part of a cohousing group, and if so, are your statements >reflected in the groups goals? Some good questions, Rob. Thanks for asking. At the risk of being "boring" I'll answer them as best I can... This is a crucial issue for me because I have every last penny of my life savings (which took me ten years to save) invested in land for a local cohousing project. I've been "political" for a long time, now, and have paid for it very deeply and personally many times. I don't think we will even approach solving our most intractible social problems in any way other than creating Modern communities. These problems include, for example, wife and child abuse, anti-environmental behavior, crushing social isolation, support for non-nuclear families, and religious and personal profit-driven exploitation. Of course, as you well know, Cohousing is not an instant cure for the problems of "America" or the rest of the world. I think it is a wonderful vehicle which seem very comprehensible to many folks, across various generational and class biases, given some successful examples. I have also found that concepts of community are now quite acceptable to many bureaucratic types largely because of the hard work at education and the personal sacrifices made by many, many people in recent times. That makes it somewhat easier to get their help. However, I think that cohousing is just as susceptible to cooptation by the privileged and powerful as any other "liberal" cause. As a Marxist communitarian I think that an active class-conscious orientation is important to help clarify the discussion and steer clear of traps which have virtually nullified most progressive legislation of the past 20 years. It is clear to me that capitalists are very capable of warping and exploiting any honest sentiment and efforts by well-meaning people to establish social trends such as cohousing. We must be clear, clever, and work hard to keep them working for us when they do. Like many cohousing groups, ours has priorities of "affordability", and "diversity". We have approached every housing agency, the lieutenant governor, and the mayor in our city and state and, now that we have our site programming down, will begin to make proposals to them to include us in their affordable housing plans. Our area's vacancy rate for 2 bedroom apartments is now below 1%. Our average house costs are rising by $1,500 a month. Our average property taxes doubled this year. We do intend to be realistic when it comes to making a pioneer project in our area in terms of financing and construction methods. Just the concept of cooperative housing is radical for this area. We intend to make the first one look good, and function well. We also got a good idea from Virginia Thigpen, the Muir Commons developer, where we will designate a fraction of any resale profits to the local cohousing umbrella because I am making the property available at well below current market value. Well, I better get back to my job.
-
reply to Rob Scott Cowley, December 14 1995
- Re: reply to Rob MelaSilva, December 14 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.