Re: economic Class and Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Legal-All Lawyers (Salley![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 06:55:22 -0600 |
Tony Rocco says: -------- ".I must know what I am getting into before I get into it and learn that I just don't have the left-wing values necessary to be accepted in a typical cohousing community." Prosperity and communinty are not mutually exclusive. There are lots of cohousers out there who are simply looking for an alternative to the alienation of urban living. It may be that there is a difference between the urban-oriented types and the rural "self-sustaining community" types. The trick is to find or create a group that has goal compatible with yours. It is true that most cohousing groups do have at least a general goal of diversity of membership, although economics and educational factors tend to limit the fulfillment of this goal. Contrary to what might appear to be the trend on this bulletin board, in my experience most groups (at least on the East Coast) are not religiously focussed, are not Marxist (although the odd member may be - remember diversity), and have no vision of living off the land! Like you, they are hoping to recreate the sense of a close-knit neighborhood or village in a disconnected world. Keep looking - you'll find your urban village! Rowena Salley [at] Volpe1.dot.gov
-
RE: economic Class and Cohousing Rob Sandelin (Exchange), December 15 1995
- Re: economic Class and Cohousing 'Judith Wisdom, December 15 1995
- Re: economic Class and Cohousing Tony G. Rocco, December 17 1995
- Re: economic Class and Cohousing Legal-All Lawyers, December 18 1995
- Re: economic Class and Cohousing Barry Krusch, December 18 1995
- RE: economic Class and Cohousing Rob Sandelin (Exchange), December 18 1995
- Re: economic Class and Cohousing Todd Samusson, December 19 1995
- Re: economic Class and Cohousing Stuart Staniford-Chen, December 19 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.