Chicago Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Philip Proefrock (PSPROEFR![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 10:24:38 -0600 |
With all this recent discussion about possible cohousing in Chicago, this seems to be a good time for me to delurk. I am a graduate student in architecture at Miami (OH) University, and I am presently working on a thesis project which involves a 25-30 family cohousing community which also incorporates business (and perhaps retail) spaces (so this also relates to the sustainability/commuting/ telecommuting discussion). My proposed site for this project is on Shefffield Ave. in Chicago; not too far from Wrigley Field. I am not working with a 'real' client on this project, but I would certainly appreciate the input of those Chicago area potential cohousers. Whether or not what I am doing matches with the real plans that may be going on, I think it might still be valuable to all involved to look at this exercise as a way of exploring other options. While cohousing is incorporated in this project, I am very interested in putting the lessons of cohousing to work in a business setting. It seems to me that consultants, telecommuters, freelancers, and other individuals who mostly work alone (either at home or in a separate office) lack some of the amenities and the 'workplace community' that others have in a more 'traditional' workplace. But, as companies continue to downsize and as more and more people become detached from the traditional workplace, a need for 'workplace community' will grow. This, it seems to me, is parallel to the development of the initial cohousing movement. Such a business center would be scaled to meet the needs of single employee businesses, as well as accommodating businesses with a few employees. It would have features which a single-employee business could not afford to maintain on its own (conference rooms and meeting rooms, for example) as well as providing an environment with 'co-workers' (even if they don't work for the same company), so that some of the social aspects of a larger office are there for people who would otherwise be working alone. Juxtaposing cohousing with this business center makes it possible for members of the community to have an office at home, but still have a separation between the home and the office. The common house can serve as a cafe which is open to the businesses during the lunch hours and then would be the community common house in the evening, and other elements from the business side might also help serve the residential side of this community. Chicago seemed like a good location for this project, because of the higher urban density. The tendency for cohousing communities to locate outside of cities (not all of them, I know) seems to be a negative thing to me. Locating in a denser area and having numerous opportunities to integrate with the larger community seems like a better strategy for forming community both within the project and in conjunction with the community's neighbors.
-
Chicago Cohousing Philip Proefrock, January 27 1996
- Re: Chicago cohousing David L. Mandel, January 28 1996
- Re: Chicago cohousing Levy N. Rivers, January 28 1996
- Re: Chicago cohousing Caryn Olczyk, January 29 1996
- Re: Chicago Cohousing Fred H Olson WB0YQM, January 30 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.