RE: Land Preservation and cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (Exchange) (Robsan![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:10:10 -0600 |
Community is one of the best ways for private individuals to preserve land. As much as some folks disagree, I still think its a great idea for group to go out into the current "country" and buy and 100 acres, use 8 acres or so for housing and preserve the rest. Over time, these private preserves will become islands of nature, and local land marks. A good example is 25 years ago a group of friends bought 400 acres in what was then a very rural spot in Thurston County and is now part of a suburban town, surrounding on all sides by subdivisions and strip malls. They have had offers of millions for his property and just recently gave it to the state as a wildlife preserve upon which they have lifetime tenture. 200 of the acres, which are nicely forested, are being developed into a nature park, with trails, etc. 100 acres is the working farm and another 100 acres is non-trailed woods buffer. 25 years from now, who will speak for the land and what will be left? Rob Sandelin Sharingwood >
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.