Limits on # of households? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Conkling, Rowena (Conkling![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 14:33:49 -0500 |
---------- Cambridge Cohousing is currently making final decisions on the number and size of units and households we want to include in our final plan for submission to the Planning Board. Because affordability is a major issue in a city such as Cambridge MA, the suggestion has been made that we increase the number of units on our site from 36 to 41, which could reduce unit cost as much as $10,000 each. It is an urban site with a mixture of town-houses, walk-ups and elevator-accessible flats, and the addition of units will not have a significant impact on the physical layout and open space. We are, however, concerned that increasing the number of households may create social/community problems. Our group will consist of at least 12 families with young children, 12 singles and 12 "others" (couples without children or with adult children, unrelated adults, etc.). Because we have a high proportion of families without children our total numbers will not be huge. One the other hand, it has been suggested that larger numbers of households tends to reduce the cohesiveness of the group, whch might then tend to break up into smaller "like" groups. Has anyone experienced problems with either too few or too many households? We would very much like to hear from existing groups how they believe the number of households affects the community, and whether you think that 41 is too many. Looking forward to your help. Rowena C. ----------
-
Limits on # of households? Conkling, Rowena, July 22 1996
- Re: Limits on # of households? MelaSilva, July 22 1996
- Re: Limits on # of households? Conkling, Rowena, July 23 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.