Re: Value vs. Cost | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Paul Conahan (pconahan![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 08:36:34 -0500 |
I wanted to thank everyone for the responses I have received regarding the issue of charging market value or actual cost for our cohousing units. Our group is now better informed and we can wrestle with this issue some more (oh no, MORE meetings!) ;) For clarification, I just wanted to state WHY we even got started on this issue. Our initial thinking was that by charging market value for certain units (i.e., similar to David Mandel's 'relative' market value), not only could we charge more for certain units, but more importantly, we could therefore charge LESS than our cost for other units. By definition, the last units remaining are usually the toughest to sell (I know I know, we're not selling real estate, we're selling community; but the reality is that people buying at the end are really buying the real estate). Since we had decided that we were going to build our community all in one shot (versus phasing, with it's associated carrying costs and dilution of marketing effort), we didn't want the tail-end of our marketing effort to take forever, and perhaps force us to wait another year to begin construction (due to the cold weather and a slew of regulations, the window for construction in Michigan is fairly small). Ergo, the DEBATE began (and continues). Paul Conahan Ann Arbor Cohousing Community -- http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pconahan/
-
Value vs. Cost Paul Conahan, September 25 1996
- RE: Value vs. Cost Rob Sandelin (Exchange), September 26 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost Paul Conahan, September 28 1996
- RE: Value vs. Cost Tom Lent, September 28 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost Tom Lent, September 28 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost Tom Lent, October 18 1996
- Re: Value vs. Cost TomMOENCH, October 21 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.