Re:Homeowners' Association Dues | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Mandel (dlmandel![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 02:45:52 -0600 |
Reading Monica's compilation of previous replies on the subject of homeowner "dues" (I'm impressed by your organization) and recognizing my own previous one therein, I'm prompted to add a couple of other short points: 1. We recently voted a 30% increase across the board. This came when we realized that we had grossly underbudgeted for reserves for repainting our exteriors. Some walls are going to start needing it soon. We're not sure what we were thinking; maybe that we'd do all the labor ourselves (chuckle). Anyway, our assessments now range from around $117 to $169, somewhat higher than they would have needed to be had be budgeted correctly from the start. The obvious lesson here: Make up your budgets carefully and re-evaluate them at least annually. California law requires a written reserve study every three years. Other states are probably similar. It was no fun to have to approve such an increase, and it creates inequities (someone who sells now will have paid less then their fair share; someone who buys now will be paying more, for instance.) By the way, after some discussion, we decided to make the increase a straight 30% and not try to figure out whether painting should be allocated by unit or proportionally to size. If felt right, because in fact it's part both. 2. Don't get blown away by the differences in numbers from one community to another. The factors vary a lot. Ours, for instance, is still pretty cheap considering that the community is responsible for maintaining and replacing roofs, painting exteriors, holding a comprehensive insurance policy (including flood) for all the buildings and paying city utilities such as water, sewerage, garbage. Communities developed on the lot model with each owner responsible for these things may pay a lot less per month in assessments. 3. We need to refer to these charges as "assessments," not "dues." The latter implies that they're voluntary, and in the unlikely event that a member fails to pay and the community has to sue or foreclose, it's important that it be clear they are mandatory. We learned this, by the way, at a recent workshop sponsored by an accounting firm that specializes in serving homeowner associations. There's a whole network out there of such HOA, with newsletters, lobbyists, trade shows, seminars, classes, etc. We are probably about to join an association of HOAs, paying dues (correct term here) of $75 a year. Anyone interested in more information can ask me. David Mandel, Southside Park.
- re:Homeowners' Association Dues, (continued)
- re:Homeowners' Association Dues Judy, March 25 1997
- Re: Homeowners' Association Dues MelaSilva, March 25 1997
- Re: Homeowners' Association Dues Denise Cote, March 27 1997
- Re: Homeowners' Association Dues Zukrow, March 27 1997
- Re:Homeowners' Association Dues David Mandel, March 28 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.