CoHousing, Elitism, $300,000 homes, 'Ordinary' people | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jack Wilbern, RA (butzwilb![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:04:08 -0500 |
Hi Anne, My name is Jack Wilbern and I'm a member of the Blueberry Hill CoHousing group in Vienna, Virginia. I have also been reading the CoHousingL list and especially the elitist lifestyle or public good section with great interest. Two thoughts: In some sense isn't cohousing an idea that is applicable to many groups of people, regardless of the obvious; like gender, race, beliefs, but also income ? Aren't people that make a little more money, and lead frantic lives, even more likely to benefit from an extended community for mutual support? Granted, there is a gamble for these frantic folk, since no one can know whether the effort required will be sustained for the long term? but then no one can say for sure what the 'right' or 'required' level of effort is to sustain a small community for the long haul. I think there was an interesting point made earlier in this section that without some systemic or larger scale, societal and economic imperative, any small community is at risk. But I digress? My second thought was on costs and relativity?we're struggling in our group to cap all costs at between $200,000 and $240,000 per unit. To put this in context however, Vienna is a suburb in Fairfax County just outside Washington DC, with a median income of over $50,000 and an average county home cost of $220,000, and within our locale the average house cost is in the $300,000 to $400,000 range. (next door is even at $700,000 per home !!!! ) So, in one perspective, our neighbors think we're low cost shacks (at worst) or 'affordable dwelling units' (at best). Our perspective is that this is going to be a real stretch. Our development costs, in an effort to do the right thing, are high because we're putting in a long road and utility tie-in, so that we're building on the 'worst' part of the site, at least from a farming perspective. The owners of the farm have valued the land very low for our benefit and their own since some of them are going to be members?and its still going to be tight. I guess where I'm going with this is that each cohousing project is going to be different based on their location, the makeup of the members and the costs either forced on them or chosen by them. Is it reverse elitism to claim that just because one project is more expensive, relative to your income, than another, that these aren't 'ordinary' people ? I would encourage you to meet the people involved in our group we seem ordinary to me. In fact, I don't think any of us are raking in the big bucks, although we're certainly working the hours. And that's why this workaholic, for one, wants to live in CoHousing. I deeply and truthfully need it for balance in my life and I am willing to work hard for that too. Jack Wilbern, RA McLean, Virginia
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.