RE: Elitist lifestyle or public good? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (Floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:34:03 -0500 |
Will cohousing change the entire American Society? Unlikely. Will it ever become the majority of new housing stock built in America. Unlikely as well. Will it provide homes and neighborhoods that offer long term community opportunities, unavailable in traditional neighborhoods? Maybe. As has been pointed out, Cohousing is just begining in America. In 50 years there may be 10,000 cohousing neighborhoods, there may be 200. There may be none. New Urbanism is unlikely to amount to much in my opinion, because it has little guts or soul behind it. Its mostly spoutings from people who do not have the real talents to make it happen and once it stops becoming the last trendy topic in academic circles, it will go away. Those of us who are living in cohousing now and creating it for the future, are active participants in a grand and somewhat idealist and visionary housing experiment. We are actually doing real stuff, learning real lessons, sharing them widely. The large townlets being built by the Disney Corporation and such will simply submerge into the same walled city mentality that surrounds many other developments these days. The reason I think this is that the people who live there will have few social decision skills, certainly not enough to create any kind of lasting bonds to each other. Without any bonds to your neighbors, there is no reason to get up at 1am in the morning to check out the ambulance at a neighbors house, and certainly not enough to go with them to the hospital, holding their hand as they have their first chest pain, heart attack scare. If I seem grumpy this evening, its because I got about 4 hours of sleep because of the above scenario happened at Sharingwood last night. Two of my neighbors followed the ambulance to the hostipal and held anothers neighbor hand as he went through probably one of the biggest scares any 50+ year old man can have: Major chest pains and numbness. He's back today, with tears in his eyes, not from chest pains, but from the recogition that even for all his cranky ways, he is loved by a lot of people. May our tribe increase. Not because of our housing architecture, but because of our decision making and commitment to each other. Cooperative collaboration, and community bonds are things worth exporting to the rest of America. They don't come with new Urbanism. They only come with community. I personally would never settle for less. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood resident of 6 years, as of yesterday, Oct. 15th. -
-
Elitist lifestyle or public good? Cohomag, October 16 1997
- Re: Elitist lifestyle or public good? Catherine Harper, October 16 1997
- Re: Re: Elitist lifestyle or public good? BilodeauA, October 16 1997
- Re: Elitist lifestyle or public good? Paul Barton-Davis, October 16 1997
- RE: Elitist lifestyle or public good? Rob Sandelin, October 16 1997
- Re: Elitist lifestyle or public good? Dahako, October 17 1997
- RE: Re: Elitist lifestyle or public good? Marci Malinowycz, October 20 1997
- Elitist lifestyle or public good? K. Collins & friends, October 20 1997
- RE: Elitist lifestyle or public good? Rob Sandelin, October 20 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.