Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: dwn2erth (dwn2erth![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 14:28:49 -0500 |
-- liz taylor "roman bitner" truly sorry you feel so strongly... I too have strong opinions especially about insular, closed minded groups who reject criticism and self examination so violently and, I feel the need to express my opinions especially when I feel that this group appears to be the more enlightened of our future (and current) real estate investors. this is not a just inflammatory and,by the way, i can handle the repercussions, and in fact, attend numerous, public political meetings and events and am quite clear in my views.. what repercussions do you suggest... "Shunning" perhaps.. .truly, the only reason I have entered this discussion has been in the hope that some of you will think about what i am saying about land use and the real impacts of our actions. I certainly have nothing to gain by pissing people like yourself off.. except perhaps being shunned.. >dwn2erth [at] pics.com ---------- > From: Roman Bitner <lilbert [at] concentric.net> > Subject: Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness > Date: Saturday, May 16, 1998 1:45 PM > > dwn2erth wrote: > I am finding it most > > interesting that my arguments are attempting to remain out of the personal > > arena and yet a fair percentage of the responses seem to be of a personal > > nature.. not really discussing the issues raised ... although they do seem > > to have touched a nerve? hmmm... > > >dwn2erth [at] pics.com > My experience with people like you is that you like to go to a list or > discussion board and stir things up, regardless of what the topic. You > write things of an inflammatory nature, then watch with glee while the > sparks fly. Then when people call you on your behavior, we are being > "personal" and overreacting. You really like the internet because it > allows you to behave as you wish with no repercussions. When somebody > responds with honesty and integrity, you are incapable of doing so in > kind, and resort to attempts to reflect your shame back on them with > comments like "must have touched a nerve". The only way to discuss > issues to your satisfaction would be to slavishly agree with you so that > you could move on to some other unsuspecting group to annoy. I will no > longer reply to your childish notes, and encourage others to do the > same. > Liz
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness, (continued)
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 15 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 15 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness dwn2erth, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Roman Bitner, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness dwn2erth, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 16 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Rob Sandelin, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness DHCano, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness PattyMara, May 16 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.