Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Matt Lawrence (matt![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 17:51:05 -0500 |
On Sat, 16 May 1998, dwn2erth wrote: > > -- maybe i "don't have a clue" I can only base my concern about suburban > sprawl with a new name on what your group presents and discusses as well > as the advertising and web pages of the various groups.. as i said before > I am sure that a small percentage of the co-housing projects do, in fact, > result in urban or village revitalization .. thank our lucky stars that > someone sees the need or recognizes the advantages.. I am finding it most > interesting that my arguments are attempting to remain out of the personal > arena and yet a fair percentage of the responses seem to be of a personal > nature.. not really discussing the issues raised ... although they do seem > to have touched a nerve? hmmm... Small percentage? How small? It seems to me that a significant number of the 30 some odd cohousing communities in this country were built in urban settings, often revitalizing the area that they were built in. So, like I said - get a clue. Also, if all you want to do is argue, go away. -- Matt
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness, (continued)
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 15 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness dwn2erth, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Roman Bitner, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness dwn2erth, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 16 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Rob Sandelin, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness DHCano, May 16 1998
- Re: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness PattyMara, May 16 1998
- RE: co-housing v.s. old-fashioned neighborliness Matt Lawrence, May 17 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.