social engineering in cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: MLYNCHIN (MLYNCHIN![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 14:03:40 -0500 |
In a message dated 05.29.98 7:19:34 PM, you wrote: <<It seems to me that in site design, one shouldn't be too rigid with the social engineering. >> hear, hear. Besides site design, my perception is that social engineering seems to creep in in other aspects of cohousing/community development. How do folks feel about *social engineering* to fit the textbook definition of "cohousing," rather than *spontaneous* community development that defines a community of cohousers? Would a mission statement for the community be a better tool in which to define the community than a set of rules/regs/policies? Are there any anecdotes? Marilyn Chin, Old Oakland CoHousing in Oakland, CA which just went through groundbreaking. We move in in 14 months.
-
social engineering in cohousing MLYNCHIN, May 30 1998
- Re: social engineering in cohousing Lynn Nadeau, May 30 1998
- RE: social engineering in cohousing Rob Sandelin, May 30 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.