Re: Tables, and other Common House questions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: cynthia . e . carpenter (cynthia.e.carpenter![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 11:53:15 -0600 |
Liz wrote: > We do buffet style meals > mostly, because cleanup and prep are much longer with family style, not > to mention we always have special diet considerations, and those meals > would have to be brought individually to the tables. We have one couple > who's team occasionally puts on a big feast and they serve family style, > but they're always cleaning up at 10:00. I think family style would be > more advantageous for small groups, but large is too difficult. The buffet vs. family-style is a question we're looking at, too, as we have just begun common house meals. We surveyed our members about their preferences and found an almost 50/50 split for family-style and buffet, so we've been experimenting with both. This isn't something you have to decide before you move in! Personally, I have a strong preference for family-style. It is much easier for families with young children and anyone with any kind of disability or infirmity to manage, and encourages, well, a family atmosphere at the table. The buffet table feels too much like a cafeteria to me. Family-style also reduces traffic and noise - a big issue in our dining room - even though we put alternatives on a separate table, so there is some getting up and down. I cooked at a large summer camp one year where we served most meals family-style and I didn't feel like it caused a lot of extra work. We often cooked or prepared directly in table-sized bowls and pans which simply meant there were more small things to clean up instead of a couple large, not really more all told, and often easier to handle, both in cooking and cleaning. Other times we did cook in a large pot and serve in smaller dishes, but usually there were only a couple of dishes per table, and they're not hard to clean since they're just used for serving. My experience, YMMV. BTW, we have rectangular tables that fit 8 (6 on long sides, 2 at ends) and they're working well (both for eating and for meetings, in various configurations). I seem to remember hearing that somewhere in cohousing experience someone figured out the exact optimal table width for conversation - any else remember this and know where to find it? - Cindy Cambridge Cohousing (pardon my long employer-attached tag) *******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer******************* Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately. If you or your employer does not consent to Internet email messages of this kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by my firm or employer unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative independent of this message.
-
Tables, and other Common House questions NLROOS, November 8 1998
- Re: Tables, and other Common House questions Stevenson/Bitner, November 8 1998
- Re: Tables, and other Common House questions cynthia . e . carpenter, November 9 1998
- Re: Tables, and other Common House questions Stevenson/Bitner, November 9 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.