Re: Tables, and other Common House questions
From: cynthia . e . carpenter (cynthia.e.carpenterus.arthurandersen.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 11:53:15 -0600
Liz wrote:

> We do buffet style meals
> mostly, because cleanup and prep are much longer with family style, not
> to mention we always have special diet considerations, and those meals
> would have to be brought individually to the tables.  We have one couple
> who's team occasionally puts on a big feast and they serve family style,
> but they're always cleaning up at 10:00.  I think family style would be
> more advantageous for small groups, but large is too difficult.

The buffet vs. family-style is a question we're looking at, too, as we have
just begun common house meals.  We surveyed our members about their
preferences and found an almost 50/50 split for family-style and buffet, so
we've been experimenting with both.  This isn't something you have to
decide before you move in!

Personally, I have a strong preference for family-style.  It is much easier
for families with young children and anyone with any kind of disability or
infirmity to manage, and encourages, well, a family atmosphere at the
table.  The buffet table feels too much like a cafeteria to me.
Family-style also reduces traffic and noise - a big issue in our dining
room - even though we put alternatives on a separate table, so there is
some getting up and down.  I cooked at a large summer camp one year where
we served most meals family-style and I didn't feel like it caused a lot of
extra work.  We often cooked or prepared directly in table-sized bowls and
pans which simply meant there were more small things to clean up instead of
a couple large, not really more all told, and often easier to handle, both
in cooking and cleaning.  Other times we did cook in a large pot and serve
in smaller dishes, but usually there were only a couple of dishes per
table, and they're not hard to clean since they're just used for serving.
My experience, YMMV.

BTW, we have rectangular tables that fit 8 (6 on long sides, 2 at ends) and
they're working well (both for eating and for meetings, in various
configurations).  I seem to remember hearing that somewhere in cohousing
experience someone figured out the exact optimal table width for
conversation - any else remember this and know where to find it?

- Cindy
Cambridge Cohousing
(pardon my long employer-attached tag)


*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message, and
notify us immediately. If you or your employer does not consent to Internet
email messages of this kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions,
conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given
or endorsed by my firm or employer unless otherwise indicated by an
authorized representative independent of this message.


Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.