Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: DHCano (DHCano![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 10:31:35 -0600 |
In a message dated 98-12-04 10:17:49 EST, floriferous [at] email.msn.com writes: >The Quaker consensus model, as practiced by Quakers, will not >work in cohousing groups unless they are strongly religious. Or, perhaps, unless they share an over-riding common value as strongly as Friends (Quakers) do the corporate 'holding in the Light' of each concern for as long as it takes until discernment is seen to have been achieved. In the case of slavery, this took decades. Yet the Society of Friends was still many, many years in advance of the overall (voting) society in which it was embedded. Present Friends are in the midst of an equally painstaking process regarding same-sex marriage -- struggling, but again far ahead of society in addressing a highly charged issue. Strange how a process that looks so slow can, when used faithfully, move a group so very far ahead (in such significant ways) of groups that use quicker, easier methods. Diane Cano Living at Ganas, an intentional community of 70+ people (eight houses) in Staten Island Worshipping at Brooklyn Friends Meeting Working as an organizational consultant with groups learning collaborative leadership
-
RE: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Rob Sandelin, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking DHCano, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stuart Staniford-Chen, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stevenson/Bitner, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stevenson/Bitner, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stuart Staniford-Chen, December 4 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.