RE: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 09:13:53 -0600 |
The subject line refers to conflict resolution, but the question seemed more about dealing with blocking and it role in consensus. Both are fairly complex topics so I'll tackle the easier one, the role of blocking. A key understanding of consensus is that consensus does not mean you agree with a decision. You can consent, and will consent, to many decisions you do not agree with. Consensus does not mean agreement, it means permission, the root word of consensus is consent. By consenting, you give permission to the group to go ahead with a decision. Often you will do so, thinking the group is blowing it, only to learn that YOU were wrong. This personal humility is a very important key to using consensus as a group process. Or, maybe in fact, you were right, the group is blowing it, and will learn something from the experience, and then apply that learning as you redo the decision. Either way, keeping the group from moving forward is the wrong thing to do. In my experience, blocking is very misused by poorly trained groups using consensus, and it causes them a lot of problems. In my opinion as a consensus facilitator trainer, you should withhold your consent (block) a decision only where you can clearly state either: 1. How this decision will have long lasting, disastrous, or very negative, irreparable effects on the whole group. 2. How this decision clearly violates the mission or purpose of the group. If individuals block the group because they don't like a decision, or because they need or want to exert power over the group, then you should NOT be using consensus as your decision making process because you will be very ineffective, make few real decisions, frustrate just about everybody in the group, and lose group members. Consensus is like a chainsaw. Its a powerful tool, when used with understanding and proper training gives wonderful results. However, in the hands of the careless or ignorant, it can cut the hell out of you. I have seen, and been part of, groups that broke apart trying to use consensus without a clue about how to do so. I also seen and been a part of groups that have been transformed by consensus into wonderful, collaborative, close, dynamic entities. When the tool works, its impressive, but it works best when the whole group understands it, not just the facilitator. Sometimes groups lack the experience together to listen and to trust each other and so blocking is used as a way to be heard. This is a break down in your process and should be remedied. One of the common problems I have observed repeatedly regarding blocking is when there is a difference between individually held values and group values. For example, an individual with strong vegetarian beliefs blocks a decision to serve chicken at community dinner. When an individual does this, they are holding the group hostage to their personal values. In my opinion, this should not be acceptable and the group should process this with clarity and compassion, but override the blocking individual. Unless the whole group is willing to agree to accept the individuals value as a group value (this occasionally happens but is pretty rare) When you over-ride a persons blocking objections you need to do so with the understanding that if this is not resolved with the individual, the blocking individual will probably leave the group. Sometimes this is the right thing to do. If an individual is constantly at odds with a group, clearly they are in the wrong group and need to be told this. In my opinion, most cohousing groups would be better to create a decision making process based on a 3/4 majority vote, then strive to achieve consensus. The Quaker consensus model, as practiced by Quakers, will not work in cohousing groups unless they are strongly religious. The modified consensus process as created in the social change movements in the 70's is a much more likely process to succeed. I teach this method to social change, non profit groups, in custom designed workshops. There a openings now for Spring of 1999.
-
RE: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Rob Sandelin, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking DHCano, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stuart Staniford-Chen, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stevenson/Bitner, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution: Really about Consensus blocking Stevenson/Bitner, December 4 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.