Re: Conflict Resolution | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kevin Wolf (kjwolf![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 23:54:02 -0600 |
I am a proponent of a backup super majority voting process because there can be occasions where non-rational, even mentally ill people are part of the group and block consensus without reason. It was a scare in this area that helped us both develop or fall back procedure and determine that we needed to clarify who had voting rights. (We have a fair number of new people coming into the community every year and community members bringing in significant others into the community. It was the later situation that spooked us into getting these issues clarified and in writing. An organization can be in a lot of trouble with a pure consensus, no vote process and not a good definition of who has the right to block decisions on such important things as what determines membership and whether there is a way to get around a single person blocking a decision. You can see how problematic this can become. Kevin Kevin Wolf and Associates - Consensus-based Facilitation 724 N Street - Internet Consulting Davis, CA 95616 - Strategic and Watershed Planning kjwolf [at] dcn.davis.ca.us - Facilitation training Phone 530-758-4211 Fax 530-758-2338 http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/go/kjwolf
- Re: Conflict Resolution, (continued)
- Re: Conflict Resolution Kevin Wolf, December 2 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution David C. Ergo, December 2 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution Unnat, December 3 1998
- Conflict Resolution mbishop, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution Kevin Wolf, December 4 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution Stevenson/Bitner, December 5 1998
- Conflict Resolution mbishop, December 7 1998
- Re: Conflict Resolution James Nordgaard, December 10 1998
- Conflict Resolution Mark & Kathy Bishop, December 10 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.