Re: remaining relevant (re: all the sex talk) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Victoria (victoria![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:37:16 -0600 (MDT) |
Hi All, I agree with Paul Marquardt when he says >this subject has little to do with morals or religion. Mostly it comes down to how we work as a society< It makes sense to me to look at 'what works' - i.e., what seems to bring happiness and comfort and effective living, stability and room to grow, to all concerned. A digression: one thing that living in cohousing has taught me in spades is that there is nothing obvious, that everything I believe will countered with someone's opposite belief. For the most part our beliefs seem to stem from our previous experiences. I have learned to listen very carefully to those who don't agree with me. If their experience has led them to a different opinion, I want to learn about why, since I clearly haven't experienced all there is. (Shakespeare said something like "There is more to this than is dreamed of in your philosophy, Horatio.") My experience - personally, as a relative and friend, as a social worker working with families, plus the reading I've done - has led me to believe that marriage and nuclear families are more often than not destructive and difficult places to live in, for kids and for grown ups. (Note I am not poly, I never even realized that anyone considered it an option outside of a few Mormons, until recently.). I offer this perspective to you simply to point out that observation can lead to different conclusions. Paul's comment that monogamy may be > a little less complicated < and something 'that works' is simply not supported by most of the evidence I have seen. I definitely do not claim to know the answer to all this - I've no idea if poly living would help deal with some of the problems caused by monogamy and nuclear families. I just point out that from my perspective it's hard to see that monogamy is a practical workable happy thing. (I know that SOMETIMES it is, just not terribly often). For the most part I see it as something that most often requires serious personal compromise at the expense of personal growth, among other things. So I am glad to know that there are those looking for better ways to live. Which is why I like the utopian novel thread. Vicky Leary Trillium Hollow Portland, Oregon ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Marquardt <ardt [at] mindspring.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <cohousing-l [at] freedom2.mtn.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 7:49 PM Subject: Re: remaining relevant (re: all the sex talk) > Hi Folks, > > I've been following this thread with a perverse (maybe voyeuristic) interest. > > In my opinion, this subject has little to do with morals or religion. > Mostly it comes down to how we work as a society. These days people are > willing to buck the wisdom passed down from past generations because it's > our God given right to "Feel Good." But the guidelines we're bucking were > not chosen arbitrarily nor to exclude anybody, but to make it easier to > share a common experience and build community. > > Living in a vaccuum, we are all free to follow our gut instincts. A few > thousand years or so ago, we found out that many times these drives can > cause problems. A person with naturally agressive tendencies may need to > curb them some to avoid being ostracized by those who want to live peacably > together. Natural born cleptos need to mainstream their desires for other > people's stuff in order to be trusted as part of a larger group. I believe > we have also learned to seek a monogamous love life to make living in large > groups easier. How? I don't particularly know, except that maybe it's a > little less complicated, especially for those of us who want to carry out > another generation. > > I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do. God knows, in these times of > overpopulation we don't all need to be spawning another generation. I just > hope we can all live together comfortably. It may be a good education for > my kids to see other lifestyles. I'll encourage them to make their own > choices, but I'll also pass onto them the things I've learned. > > I think we're all born on some part of the continuum of "poly." I don't > think it's a bad thing to want other partners. I do think that most folks > fall in love more than once. Does it really take being sexual to show > that? > > These are some of the thoughts this discussion has provoked in me. Now I > can quit thinking them for a bit. > Peace. > -Paul > >
-
Re: remaining relevant (re: all the sex talk) Paul Marquardt, October 27 1999
- Re: remaining relevant (re: all the sex talk) Victoria, October 28 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.