Re: design question | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Unnat (Zen![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 05:00:08 -0700 (MST) |
> Does anybody have experiences with offering "shells" enabling individual > households to locate walls & fittings as individually preferred? For > example, I have seen designs where the purchaser has the choice to have more > bedrooms and a smaller lounge or the opposite. At Pinakarri, our choices were constrained by our state funded budget (for public rental housing). A further constraint was our own desire to have the commonhouse built as part of the project - we each volunteered to reduce the budget for each of our houses by about 6-8% to fund the commonhouse. To enable this we agreed to standardise the design. Within each of our standard rectangular shells was a basic internal layout which we could modify to some degree. Where the walls are located doesn't seem to be such a cost issue unless they're weight bearing or affect another expensive item. Ask your architect about big cost areas, eg consolidate wet areas and plumbing where possible. Use standard window sizes to begin with - you'll end up with several - then modify according to your own priorities, eg we wanted (relatively expensive) louvred windows in our high gabled ceilings to maximise air flow. BTW, someone recommended A Pattern Language - I do too. It's a great primer for getting your head around space and relationships and personal priorities. Although the book looks chunky, the contents come in delicious bite-sized pieces. Warmly Robyn Williams Pinakarri Community Fremantle, Western Australia
-
Re: design question Hans Tilstra, December 19 1999
- Re: design question Berrins, December 19 1999
- Re: design question Unnat, December 20 1999
- Re: design question betsygamble, December 20 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.