Re: fences - immediate concern | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Berrins (Berrins![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 22:37:28 -0700 (MST) |
In a message dated 2/12/2000 12:05:15 PM, lll [at] crocker.com writes: << We have an immediate concern. We have a design review committee meeting tomorrow morning (Sunday 9am), to hear a request for a fenced dog yard. >> (Hi Laura!) Sorry this is getting to you later than your meeting; I hope it went well. I think they should get the fence; the question is, what kind? Some folks have suggested that an "invisible" fence, as opposed to a physical one, is a better choice. There are pros and cons to both types. I lean towards using a physical fence in the back yards. A physical fence needs to be high enough to keep the dog from jumping over it and installed low enough in the ground to prevent him/her from digging under it. So, it will likely create a visual barrier. However, a nice looking fence (say, for example,with morning glories or grapes growing on it) could add an esthetic component. An invisible fence would allow other people to walk through the yard, but then there might be some whining about do ggy poo. Say, for example, a passing child plays with the dog, brings home a gift under his shoes and tracks it through the house. Or, just seeing the piles of poo as you walk to the Common House or parking lot every day might provoke a "why don't they clean up that ___?" Also, one of our families is worried about a dog getting too playful with a younger child; a physical fence would decrease the chances that a dog would knock down a child by accident. If you don't have one already, an invisible fence would be a great idea in the woods or in your large field. If the Pioneer dog owners split the cost, a large area could be set off as an unleashed dog run; wear your boots. I do think you have to worry about setting a precident. You know our group well enough to know that if someone gets something special, somebody else is bound to ask for it! (Laura is our architect, and you should see the beauteous homes that are just beginning to be finished!) A fence policy may be an onerous task, but would add objectivity to future requests. We all know it's better to act then react. That said, I suppose we at Pathways should go ahead and talk about this as well.... Dang. (see you for our walk-through sometime soon...) -Roger
- Re: fences - immediate concern, (continued)
- Re: fences - immediate concern PattyMara, February 13 2000
- RE: fences - immediate concern Rob Sandelin, February 13 2000
- Re: fences - immediate concern Larry Landrum, February 13 2000
- Re: fences - immediate concern Larry Landrum, February 13 2000
- Re: fences - immediate concern Berrins, February 13 2000
- Re: fences - immediate concern Berrins, February 14 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.