Re: Docs for Homeowners Association | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: RowenaHC (RowenaHC![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:58:26 -0700 (MST) |
In a message dated 3/7/00 1:00:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, PattyMara [at] aol.com writes: << Our HOA structure and by-laws are strictly boiler room, friendly to the suits, legal documents that are generic to condos across the state. Yawn. We were encouraged to do it this way by our lawyer in order to not raise any eyebrows from the bank. >> We found that banks, etc. had no objection to the coho friendly language we put in - goals for living, consensus voting, right of first refusal, etc, - so long as there was a bottom line which said that if all this stuff fails we can fall back on a vote and if we can't find a buyer the seller has teh right to put the unit on the open market. I do think it is important to get the coho stuff in - the appropriate balance between the obligations of the "Managing Board" and that of the "entire community." One useful purpose it serves is to have the group focus on how these things will work when you are dealing with real money, maintenance, bills, etc. I thought the Cohousing Network was collecting these documents to make them available on line. TCHN people - where are you? Rowena Cambridge Coho
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.