Questioning cohousing ideals | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: lance millward (millwardl![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 23:50:20 -0600 (MDT) |
I am a landscape architecture student from New Zealand. I have been in contact with many on the list relating to a research paper I was doing on cohousing. I am now designing a conceptual community linked to a language school, swimming complex and fields in my community. My lecturer is an urban designer WHO QUESTIONS THE POINT OF COHOUSING AND DISBELIEVES ANYTHING I TRY AND SUGGEST TO HER ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF CLOSER COMMUNITY. This is a plea for help!!!!! Please, please, please reply to these quesitions so I can clarify the issues with her. 1. How do you justify separating cars into central carparks on the perimeter of a community? Issues of access to the homes, weather etc seem to preclude having perimeter parking in her mind. 2. How do clusters of houses help to improve closer relations between residents and how do you still promote the wider public using your assets? 3. What form would a common house take if you were attempting to provide a restaurant, common eating, laundry, conference rooms and apartments for short stay residents? I have designed a three story arc shaped building with apartments above conference rooms about more shared assests like restaurant and community dining. 4. The rythmn of the street relies on buildings having a prescribed setback from the street [supposedly]. By clustering my buildings and facing them toward the local river, I have turned my back on this 'streetscape'. How do you address this change of rythmn and change of ownership of space [balance of public and private space has been altered]. I have done considerable research into these things but there don't seem to be any real justifications for them beyond 'that is what has worked previously'. I am aware that models of cohousing have been developed over more than thirty years; but find it frustrating that i can't find anything to justify using these techniques of closer community. I have a strong belief that they are better than what suburbia has to offer, but need proof in some form. I have sent very few emails to the list trying to only send the most vital ones; again Im begging here for some people to respond with some helpful personal comments, rather than books I should read as I only have a month befor my project is due. Sincerely lance millward landscape architecture student
-
Questioning cohousing ideals lance millward, September 6 2000
- Re: Questioning cohousing ideals Howard Landman, September 7 2000
- Re: Questioning cohousing ideals lilbert, September 7 2000
- Re: Questioning cohousing ideals Hans Tilstra, September 7 2000
- Re: Questioning cohousing ideals RowenaHC, September 7 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.