unit selection priority - a different view | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Don Flick (don![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:32:27 -0700 (MST) |
Sounds like seniority is the prevailing model. Here's a somewhat different scenario from River Rock Commons (Fort Collins, CO). We had strong support for: 1) "Let's see how much overlap there is in people's choices, rather than assume there will be a considerable amount." See NOTE below. 2) "Let's resolve the overlapping choices by working together" (those who want the same unit further elaborating on the factors involved for them, the relative weight of those factors, careful listening to one another, etc.) 3) "This is an important, early experience that can have much significance in defining who we are. Let's put forward the extra trust needed for a process that de-emphasizes competition and priviledge." One member of our group who had been involved from the very beginning was quite anxious to have a particular unit, thought there was at least one other person who wanted the same unit, and did not want to take any risk of not getting it. So we pursued a main strategy consistent with 1, 2, and 3 above, with a backup strategy based on a combination of factors that assured the one member's choice. The results? 1) There were not many "overlaps". 2) The "overlaps" that did exist were easily resolved, in a fun and cooperative way. 3) We did not need the backup strategy. In fact, there wasn't even any "overlap" involving the unit that the one person was so keen on. NOTE: During the site design process, Katie McCamant frequently asked for a show of preferences to verify that we were spreading the "desirability" around, and not concentrating it in one place. Wonderland, the developer, created and our Finance Team fine- tuned a schedule of premiums that adjusted the price of units based on factors that were regarded as clearly favorable or not so favorable. After the process described above, new members chose their units on a "first come, first served" basis, selecting, of course, from among the remaining unsold units. That did not go 100% smoothly. At one point, there were hard feelings around a family reserving a unit, but not acting "quickly enough"; and then losing the reservation on "their" unit.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.