Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Patty M Gourley (pattymara![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 11:57:54 -0700 (MST) |
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000 00:32:29 -0600 "Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> writes: >Back to our affordable cohousing project. They have no resources, that is why they are making an affordable housing project. They approach a local affordable housing group. Oops. Cohousing requires lots of time commitments and community building work. Hmmmm. This is undesirable from the non-profits point of view, too much is required. No thanks, we'll pass on this project, since we already have the next 3 years worth of block grants targeted. > At Tierra Nueva, on the central CA coast, we were offered our 4.5 acres of land from a private individual who requested (among several other items) that we provide housing for low-income seniors. Since we didn't have any money to buy land in the California real estate market, our core group spent over 5 years of blood, sweat and tears working with the local Housing Authority and private low-income housing providers. And what Rob said above was true for us. After 3 years of dancing around with the Housing Authority they dropped us like a hot potato. The other entity, People's Self Help Housing, graciously kept us dangling for only 3 or 4 months. We spent countless hours and thousands of dollars on legal fees to help create a contract with the Housing Authority only to have them dump us. We continued to work feverishly to satisfy our landowner's wishes by hiring consultants in senior housing, searching for a local developer who would take us on and steeping ourselves in the intricacies of community block grant requirements. Finally we realized we had done everything in our power and had come up with zip. So we approached the landowner and said, "Let us build cohousing here. (Instead of the Low Income Senior Housing-Cohousing hybrid she had required) We'll create an inter generational community that will be good for seniors, and we're doing everything we can already to make it affordable for all of us." After a nervous week of waiting. She said yes. And we proceeded. >And so, to do cohousing successfully, based on what I know of the built groups in > America takes a couple things. 1. Money and 2. People with a high level of drive to > succeed under difficult circumstances. We had the high level of drive. We didn't have money, so we borrowed $65,000 to the initial development work. It was high risk, and we struggled for years not knowing if the core group would have to pony up our share of the debt. >From my experiences, Currently, cohousers are people that are almost uniformly middle class, college educated, who have good paying jobs. Right again, Rob. That's a fairly good profile of our 27 households. Except that over half of us are seniors, retired, living on fixed incomes. But they all had the money to buy, because they had owned houses before. > Those that succeeded had: Money enough to cover the initial project costs, > or a compelling enough project that a developer partnered with > them. But if you talk with folks that partnered with developers, guess what? They > required a vast majority of the units be pre-sold to approved mortgagable > buyers. Righto. We borrowed that initial money at high personal risk, and eventually Wonderland agreed to save our ass and co-develop with us. And we did have to pre-sell most of our units. > And while there is housing money around, it has some strings attached which > make it difficult to access for cohousing projects. Not impossible, but pretty hard. >Vashon cohousing did it. We didn't have money, but we did have the "gift" of land. And it had plenty of strings attached. But we jumped through the hoops over and over. Sometimes I look back and just shake my head in wonderment. The new members who bought houses toward the end of that long perilous road are sick to death of hearing about our early struggles. And so am I. But something motivated us to keep on risking, and that something was a collective vision that in many ways has come to reality. And in some ways, has not. We are all dealing with some disappointments. That's where we are now. On the verge of rewriting our vision statement to more clearly reflect who we are now. I wonder how long it will take us? I am so inspired by the Pinakarri vision statement: "Through Pinakarri-deep listening-we learn to love more completely. " I hope we have the courage to recreate our vision statement in that same tone. To have the courage to redirect the emphasis from the physical houses/neighborhood to the interpersonal relationships that are at the core of community life. coheartedly, Patty Mara Gourley Tierra Nueva, Central CA Coast ..... ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
-
The economic realities of Cohousing development Rob Sandelin, November 2 2000
- Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development Becky Schaller, November 3 2000
- Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development Fred H Olson, November 3 2000
- Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development Sharon Villines, November 3 2000
- Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development Patty M Gourley, November 3 2000
- Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development Diane Simpson, November 5 2000
- Re: The economic realities of Cohousing development Kay Argyle, November 9 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.