Much ado | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Grace Benjamin (grey_sea![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:32:00 -0700 (MST) |
Hello everybody! This affordability thread has been quite lively, and I'm moved to respond on a few points. But I'll try and make it quick. Number one- some have commented that the original controversial post that "stirred the pot" was insulting and patronizing- and the impression I received was that the insulting tone was unwaranted. Well, I looked back through the archives, and the only time a few nuggets of good info come out about issues such as diversity, affordability, and pretty much anything hot-button is when somebody gets a little bit "nasty". I just don't see people getting motivated to speak up and share their insight, and viewpoint unless they are also feeling defensive on some of these issues somehow. Not that I'm an advocate for rudeness; never! What would my finishing school teacher say!! But rather that people really seem to blossom, and share important things with each other, as soon as they either take a step, or get gently nudged outside of their comfort zone. This brings me to my second point. Number two- if you are serious about building something affordable- step boldly outside your comfort zone. Stepping outside your confort zone is not any fun- it's uncomfortable. So why do something uncomfortable? Because of the benefit it will get you. (There's a lot to be said for enlightened self-interest! ;o) But stretching outside of your comfort zone, and doing something more than making your life, and your children's lives comfy and cushy, gets you something intangible and valuable. It's like runner's (or rower's for anybody who sculls out there) high, I can tell you how great the high is all I want, but you won't know until you go out and run (or row) five miles, hit the wall and work through it. So what would stepping outside your comfort zone be in Cohousing? Make the more expensive units expensive enough to outright subsidize the affordable ones. Find out how your group can be considered as a developer for low/median income housing in your area. Consider a different form of intentional community. Which brings me to my last point. Number three- definitions. CoHousing, Intentional Community, mission, goals etc. CoHousing is an intentional community on a really long, really wide continuum of community types. This habit of classifying communities with different names along the continuum exists because it makes talking about a particular place easier; not because creating a place is easier/better if we make it match it with a particular name, and trim it to fit all characteristics people have assigned to that name (or maybe some people do, do things in that way) I would hazzard though, that if you stamp out (or rather stamp people into) a community that matches predefined characteristics, you're going to sacrifice a lot of community along the way. For instance, there is a person who uses a wheelchair to get about that is interested in joining your community, and would be a good fit for the group, but really needs to be able to get a car up close to their home. Do you effectively deny access to this person because you're commited to the concept of perimeter parking? There is this idea that great art does not obey the rules, but re-interprets them. The same would seem to be true here. One last thing in this vein- CoHousing, by it's nature is something for the middle and upper class to jump on, like bees to honey- but I think we get to define it any way that we choose. There is the nature of how things develop, but those of us in the process of developing things get to have a say in the direction that development takes. No, we don't get to make the lending rules, but we do get to decide what's important to us. So while it is very accurate that if affordabilty/ green construction became benchmarks of the CoHousing mission, the CoHousing movement would likely fizzle; that's a sad commentary. How pathetic is it that if a movement becomes directly associated with being socially responsible as opposed to being self serving- it either fizzles or becomes perceived as a fringe? It makes me sad to think that being financially comfortable also makes you disinterested in your social responsabilities as a human. Thanks for reading my 2 cents worth! Peace and blessings you everyone reading. Grace
- Re: Much Ado, (continued)
- Re: Much Ado Robyn Williams, November 1 2000
- RE: Much Ado Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 1 2000
- Re: Much Ado lilbert, November 1 2000
- RE: Much Ado Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 2 2000
- Much ado Grace Benjamin, November 3 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.