Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 09:51:38 -0700 (MST) |
> I think canceling meetings is disrespectful to the people who have made > the effort to arrange schedules to attend meetings. It is also not a good idea to hold meetings for which there is no agenda. And it raises the question of who a meeting is for--the "leaders" or the attendees. If it is for the attendees, it can't be cancelled without their permission. To get permission, you have to notify them. I have difficulty with presenters assigning time to agenda items. The question is not how much time the presenter needs but how much time the group needs for discussion. How can the presenter know that? If the presenter knows that, the discussion is probably irrelevant. Perhaps the real issue is the planning a meaningful agenda before the meeting is scheduled, and if it is a regularly scheduled meeting, maintaining a good "things needing to be discussed" list so there are always topics that need discussion. We all know we have them, we just can't remember what they are when an unexpected opportunity arises. With so many more comprehensive means of making announcements and giving reports (email and bulletin boards--hard copy instead of oral tradition), discussion and/or consensus is the primary need for a business meeting. Sharon -- Sharon Villines In Washington, DC where all roads lead to Casablanca Takoma Village Cohousing http://www.takomavillage.org http://www.cohousing.org
-
Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings DCS, December 16 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Sharon Villines, December 17 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Mary E. Faccioli, December 18 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Berrins, December 18 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Brian Baresch, December 18 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.