Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Baresch (baresch![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:39:24 -0700 (MST) |
>I agree that a presenter may not know exactly how long a discussion will >take, but a presenter (either an experienced individual or committee) should >be able to guesttimate how much time it will take to achieve whatever goal >they have in mind. That said, some goals are easer to predict time for than >others. The more serious the issue and the closer to consensus you need to >get, the more difficult it becomes to predict, especially with larger groups. > Be generous with more serious issues, then add more time. We've found that this works -- the presenters estimate how much time an item will take, then the timekeeper watches the clock and keeps us aware of how much time we're taking. If it looks as if we need more time, the group decides whether to extend discussion, drop the subject, or defer it to next week (or to a committee). If it looks as if we'll run out of time, we decide whether to let the meeting go long (child care is a frequent concern) or shorten or defer some items. So far it's gone smoothly. Best regards, Brian Baresch Delaware Street Commons Lawrence, Kansas www.delaware-street.com
-
Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings DCS, December 16 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Sharon Villines, December 17 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Mary E. Faccioli, December 18 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Berrins, December 18 2000
- Re: Cancelling, Scheduling Special Meetings Brian Baresch, December 18 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.