Re: Liability as an employer | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Steve Williams (sbwilliams![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:12:11 -0700 (MST) |
I will speak from my experience in the old days (pre-1990) as a tax accountant and farmer in Ohio. We used to suggest that anyone who paid others to do work while on their property have Workers' Compensation insurance as required of employers by law. The fact that a person claimed to be an independent contractor, or even claimed to have Workers' Comp insurance, did not protect an "employer" from liability if it turned out that an injured person did not, in fact, have a Workers' Comp account. As long as the "employer" had the account in place, even if not paying premiums beyond the administrative fee, Workers' Comp covered claims rather than trying to collect from the "employer". So ... who should have had the Workers' Comp coverage in Ohio back in those days? (The same principles may still apply, but I'm not up to date) Anyone who hired a babysitter or a lawnmower or an electrician or an appliance repair person ... the list goes on. Since most people who routinely hired these kinds of people to do work at their property did not have Workers' Comp coverage, our next-best suggestion was for the "employer" to require the worker to show his or her certificate of Workers' Comp coverage.
-
Liability as an employer Lynn Nadeau, February 1 2001
- Re: Liability as an employer Steve Williams, February 1 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.