Re: Concensus and Lenders | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Peter Scott (ps![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:41:13 -0700 (MST) |
Here at Earthsong our legal stuff refers to a two step process, of firstly that the group "shall be consulted" using the group decisionmaking process (defined as 2 attempts at a consensus etc) and secondly failing that a 75% majority vote of financial interests. While we see the latter as a backstop, the banks etc see the latter and dont really care about the former. You can read the fine print on our website at http://www.ecohousing.pl.net/resource/ca.html Peter Scott Earthsong jonathan ogren wrote: > We are in the beginning stages of forming a cohousing group in Austin, > TX. Like many cohousing groups, we are going to use concensus as > our decision making process. In one of our very helpful > sources of information,The Co-Housing Resource Guide compiled by Rob > Sandelin, it says you should not state you are using concensus as your > decision making process in incorparation documents because it is not a > recognized decision making process for many lenders. Is this something > to be concerned about? Has anyone put concensus in their bylaws and majority > vote in their incorparation documents and had a conflict? Is it > possible to create both documents so they do not conflict?
-
Concensus and Lenders jonathan ogren, February 4 2001
- Re: Concensus and Lenders Peter Scott, February 4 2001
- Re: Concensus and Lenders Jim Snyder-Grant, February 4 2001
- Concensus and Lenders C2pattee, February 5 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.