Concensus and Lenders | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: C2pattee (C2pattee![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:45:44 -0700 (MST) |
I'm on the Board of Directors of a women's music festival (the Northeast Women's Music Retreat - NEWMR), that incorporated as a not for profit organization after we received a large bequest "to buy land for a [permanent home] for a women's music festival". Coming out of that good old Women's Liberation tradition, we wrote consensus into our bylaws - and it has created endless problems. Consensus is a good way to work through the decision making process, and I continue to believe in this approach for groups seeking to build a community. The problem with consensus comes when you need to make a decision, and a small number of individuals block or endlessly delay action. My feeling now is that consensus should be an agreed-upon group process, but that bylaws should be written in plain English, include the 'boilerplate' required by the authorizing legal entity, and contain a clear voting method to resolve those decisions that can't be settled by consensus, and will have legal and/or financial repercussions if they aren't settled. Good contracts make good communities Christine Pattee Greater Hartford CT Cohousing c2pattee [at] aol.com
-
Concensus and Lenders jonathan ogren, February 4 2001
- Re: Concensus and Lenders Peter Scott, February 4 2001
- Re: Concensus and Lenders Jim Snyder-Grant, February 4 2001
- Concensus and Lenders C2pattee, February 5 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.