RE: ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lashbrook, Stephan (lashbrook![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:00:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Please note that California has its own ADA-type laws that are, or at least used to be, considerably more strict than the federal requirements. Stephan -----Original Message----- From: Eileen McCourt [mailto:emccourt [at] mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:01 PM To: Cohousing-L@Cohousing. Org Subject: [C-L]_ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act I'm interested in what experiences cohousing communities have had in the designation of their common house as a "public building". Was your common house designated as a "public building"? What were the criteria on which this designation was based? Do you have any idea how much cost was added to the common house to come into compliance with ADA as a result of the "public building" designation? Is your building one-level or two? Do you have an elevator? I'm especially interested in California. Thanks. --eileen Eileen McCourt Oak Creek Commons Cohousing in Paso Robles, CA emccourt [at] mindspring.com phone 650-691-1195 fax 650-691-0195 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act Eileen McCourt, April 12 2001
- Re: ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act Jim Snyder-Grant, April 13 2001
-
RE: ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act Rob Sandelin, April 15 2001
- Re: common house as a public building Hans Tilstra, April 15 2001
- RE: ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act Lashbrook, Stephan, April 12 2001
- Re: ADA Compliance - Americans with Disabilities Act Berrins, April 15 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.