Re: Mandatory cooking cautionary note | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kristina Spencer (kspencer![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:13:02 -0600 (MDT) |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Elizabeth Stevenson wrote: > seriously flawed. Two people is not enough to make a happy cook team. IT > DOESN'T WORK TO HAVE A COOK TEAM OF ONLY TWO PEOPLE. It's so much work that > you're exhausted after the meal, and dread cooking instead of looking > forward to it. Many communities seem to think that cooking is a necessary > evil. It can be so much easier! Just have to pipe in here. My family is the newest at Winslow Cohousing in Bainbridge Island, WA (we moved in last October). We have 2 person cook teams and cooking is *not* mandatory... yet we still manage to have meals 5 nights/week (Sun-Thurs) and a decent participation rate (ballpark figures: a small meal is 20ish, a large meal 50 or so with most falling into the 35-40 range out of a population of 80). I've lead cooked twice now and have found both times to be fun and not very stressful at all (the anticipation is worse than the actual doing). Granted, we have the benefit of being one of the oldest cohousing communities in the states, so we've had time to work through the bumps to find something that works well for us. The way it works here is that you determine how many nights/week you plan to eat a common meal in a 7 week cycle. Depending on how many people opt in, and how often they plan to eat, a schedule is created. Each night there is a lead and assistant cook, and 2 cleaner-uppers. We eat twice/week which gives my husband and I each 4 work shifts in that 7 week period (if a larger than normal number of people opt in, we would still have 4 shifts, but the 7 week period would be extended). Lead cooking counts for 2 shifts (as it entails responsibility for creating the menu, shopping, cooking, and accounting). Some people always want to cook, some people never do - that's okay, because they do cleanup. Anyhow, just a differing opinion. There are a lot of ways to make this work, including non-mandatory, and with 2-person teams. Mostly, it seems to me, you have to have people who are committed to it. Mandating that people participate doesn't seem the best way to motivate, imho. Kristina Winslow Cohousing Bainbridge Island, WA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kristina Spencer We are an endless moving stream kspencer [at] drizzle.net in an endless moving stream. -Jisho Warner ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Mandatory cooking cautionary note Elizabeth Stevenson, April 16 2001
- Re: Mandatory cooking cautionary note Kristina Spencer, April 16 2001
-
Re: common house meals /[Mandatory cooking cautionary note] Peter Scott, April 16 2001
- Re: common house meals /[Mandatory cooking cautionary note] Kristina Spencer, April 16 2001
- Common Meal costs Robert P. Arjet, April 17 2001
- RE: Common Meal costs Catya Belfer-Shevett, April 17 2001
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.