Re: Giving or Taking - paying for schools and childcare
From: David Mandel (dlmandelpacbell.net)
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 02:20:03 -0600 (MDT)
    This discussion really reinforces what I've always believed: that property tax should be abolished. It's just too divisive; too many reasons for too many people to feel it's unfair to them, while it in fact perpetuates class divisions because rich towns collect more and can afford better schools while they keep out the poor. Also, the egislative/ administrative/judicial energy and resources invested in securing exemptions for dubious "educational" and "religious" institutions and "charities" could be so much better spent on the causes they purport to pursue.
    Property tax should be replaced by a higher and much more progressive tax on individuals and corporations, and a steep estate tax, all of which would support schools and the rest of government's functions just fine, affect the very rich significantly, the rest of us hardly at all. But most Americans would be aghast at the thought, believing as they do that they're only a lottery ticket away from being very rich themselves.

... late night musings from David Mandel in Sacramento
 
 

We are non-parents, most of whose property taxes goes to pay for the
local public school system. ...
and

 Many towns are resistant to cohousing-style homes, i.e. small and clustered, because they bring in lots of kids and little tax money.  ... Everybody from the town planner to newspaper articles made it clear that the town did not want any more housing built, especially anything in the affordable (cheap=low taxes) range.

  _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.