Cohousing Axioms - Development | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mac & Sandy Thomson (ganesh![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 13:06:02 -0700 (MST) |
This is a very interesting theory that Chris proposes. I think it has merit, although I'm not sure that I agree with it altogether. We developed Heartwood Cohousing ourselves (with some consulting help from Jim Leach), but I don't think we suffered all of the calamities Chris mentioned. Although our group developed our community, the group didn't tightly control the development process. That's because we didn't do much of the detailed development work as a group. I was given incredible latitude as Project Manager and in the many years that I worked full time in that position, I handled most of the details and mostly brought only the 'big' decisions to the group. We also had numerous teams that attended to detail work as well as an Assistant Project manager that I hired from within our group who did a phenomenal job during the year and a half of the big design and construction crunch. Perhaps we avoided much of the development burnout because of the big time delegation we did. Some of the points Chris brought up really rang a bell with me. One is the notion that putting too much energy into private home design sucks the energy out of a group. I would go further and say that the current model of cohousing development focuses way too much energy on design, including common house and site design. Our group had 5 major weekend workshops before move-in: site design, common house design, 2 private home design, and consensus training. Of the 5, I think the consensus training was by far the most valuable in terms of group cohesion and community building. Consensus training is really a bit of a misnomer. The workshop really dealt with communication skills, feedback model, in depth discussion of vision, values, and interpersonal agreements, and how we run our meetings (both practical and philosophical). We required all new members to take consensus training before being able to vote. Because we acquired members over time, we offered the training several times. The first time we hired a corporate team building guy for about $1500 who did a good job. After that, however, we taught the training ourselves (in house) and were better able to custom tailor it to our culture and save $1500 a pop. One thing that occurred to me during all of the design workshops was that we pretty much always started at ground zero with brainstorming ideas and after many, many hours, we developed programs and designs that didn't seem all that different from what I've seen at other cohousing communities. Our common house has a dining room, kitchen, hearth room (living room), romp room, bathrooms, entry with mail, rec room, guest rooms, laundry, arts and crafts room, and storage. We have 2, 3, and 4 bedroom private homes -- some duplex, some singles -- all with kitchens to the front. We incorporated energy efficiency and passive solar throughout. I think we could have not started at ground zero and instead said, "Here's what other communities have done, how do we want to modify that to fit our particular needs?" We could have saved maybe half of the design workshop time. I would have used that time for more workshops in line with our consensus training. I think that because cohousing has been driven by mostly design and development professionals, there's been extra emphasis on design at the expense of group process. I'd venture that if more time was spent on training the soon-to-be-neighbors how to work with all of the new relationship complexities and decision making, there would be more harmony and less discord (power struggles) at move-in. Please understand that I am eternally grateful to the fantastic work that Chuck, Katie, Jim, Matt, Chris, and others have done for cohousing and Heartwood. I'd just like to see cohousing development evolve to include a greater emphasis on developing relationships in addition to developing real estate. My 2¢ worth, Mac -- Mac & Sandy Thomson Heartwood Cohousing ganesh [at] rmi.net Durango, Colorado Web Site: http://www.heartwoodcohousing.com Everything in excess!! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites! Moderation is for monks. - Robert Heinlein _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.