Re: Power structures in group process | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tree Bressen (tree![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:27:01 -0700 (MST) |
Rob wrote: >I think a huge mistake that cohousing groups make, particularly in the >development process, is letting new people, who have no history, and no >training or experience in group process, have veto power over the group. Many groups that use consensus choose to put some screens in place to help address this problem. For example, no blocking power for 6 months or until you've attended a certain number of meetings in general or on that topic or until you've taken a consensus training workshop. While cohousing communities have particular requirements arising from their legal and financial structures and the pressures of the development process, i imagine some protection of this type would still be possible. The newcomers' input can still be welcomed, it's just an extra security in case something goes awry, given that, as Rob said, most of us are taught to be fairly self-centered about our interests and it takes time to unlearn that. I notice that after lurking for several months on this list i seem to have suddenly become a very active participant! So i thought maybe i should introduce myself a bit. My name is Tree Bressen, and i live at Walnut St. Co-op in Eugene, Oregon. From 1994-99 i lived at Acorn, an income-sharing commune in rural Virginia that was a spin-off group from its famous neighbor, Twin Oaks (a '60s commune that is still going strong after more than 30 years). I have never lived in cohousing and don't know that i ever will, but joined this list to stay in contact with what's happening in the movement. I've been dedicated to supporting community living for over a decade now, and the surge in cohousing communities is certainly one of the most exciting things i've seen. I do a lot of work with two communities movement organizations, the Fellowship for Intentional Community (FIC is the group that publishes the big Communities Directory and Communities magazine and runs the www.ic.org website) and the Federation of Egalitarian Communities (FEC is an association of 15 intentional communities with common principles such as income-sharing, non-violence, and ecological sustainability). Group process is a central passion in my life. I give workshops on consensus, facilitation, conflict resolution, and related skills to intentional communities and other organizations (non-profits, political activists, schools, worker co-ops, etc.). I'd like to say that overall i've been very impressed with the level of savvy and sensitivity that folks on this list have offered in response to the various questions that arise on these and other topics. It's neat to see people being thoughtful and sharing support--thank you! Cheers, --Tree ----------------------------------------------- Tree Bressen 1680 Walnut St. Eugene, OR 97403 (541) 484-1156 tree [at] ic.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Using Professionals to Help Define Decision-Making Processes, (continued)
- Re: Using Professionals to Help Define Decision-Making Processes Maggi Rohde, February 3 2002
- Re: Using Professionals to Help Define Decision-Making Processes Robert P. Arjet, February 3 2002
- Consensus Sharon Villines, February 4 2002
- Re: Power structures in group process Tree Bressen, February 4 2002
- About Tree Bresson Rob Sandelin, February 5 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.