RE: conflict resolution process | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tree Bressen (tree![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 01:13:05 -0700 (MST) |
Rob wrote: >It is naive to think there is one process that works for >everybody, or that you can adopt some community process and its going to >work. Sorry, different styles of conflict require very different approaches. While i think there is a lot of wisdom in this, i've noticed that there are some similarities in the methods of conflict resolution that i've studied so far, and i think these can be built on. Admittedly my focus has mainly been facilitation rather than mediation per se, but there is a lot of overlap, and part of why one gets asked in as a facilitator is to deal with conflicts. While most of my professional work is group-based, i also do one-to-one mediations for friends. The main piece i see underlying various methods centers on empathy and reflection. People need to feel heard. They want to know that other people get it about why they're upset. So if something's going on in the moment and/or you don't have a professional available, my advice is to do basic reflective listening. Ideally the parties in conflict will be able to do this with each other, but even having each party reflected back by a third person does a lot of good. After one person talks--briefly! or else it will be too much to remember--the listener simply says back what they heard, without judgment, without advice, without trying to fix it, just simply listening and responding with as much compassion as they can muster. You don't need to say back every word, rather seek to understand the essence of what was conveyed. After a few times of this then switch to the other person. I've seen this simple tool go most of the way toward resolving major conflicts. I've experienced its magic over and over again both as participant and as mediator. While i think Rob's advice to have local, professional mediation on hand is sound, i've also seen plenty of successful internal community mediations. If the two people in conflict are willing to sit down with a third person who they both trust, often that person acting as witness and support is enough to help things along, without even saying much. Of course, sometimes just getting the people to sit down together is a real challenge, and that's where a community culture that expects conflicts to be dealt with is helpful. Good luck, --Tree ----------------------------------------------- Tree Bressen 1680 Walnut St. Eugene, OR 97403 (541) 484-1156 tree [at] ic.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Cohousing and Televison: a Classic Clash of Values, (continued)
- Re: Cohousing and Televison: a Classic Clash of Values Howard Landman, February 9 2002
- conflict resolution process Kate Nichols, February 9 2002
- Re: conflict resolution process Sharon Villines, February 9 2002
- RE: conflict resolution process Rob Sandelin, February 9 2002
- RE: conflict resolution process Tree Bressen, February 10 2002
- alternatives to violence Robyn Williams, April 7 2002
- Re: Cohousing and Televison: a Classic Clash of Values Michael D, February 1 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.